> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.cogniagent.ai/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# How a coworker gets better

> A new AI coworker is competent. One that's been working for you three months is genuinely useful. Here's what changes and how to help it along.

A new coworker is competent. One that's been working for you for three months is genuinely useful. The difference isn't the model — it's everything it has picked up about you.

## The three things that accumulate

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Memory" icon="brain" href="/cowork/control/memory">
    Notes about you, your preferences, and the work. Built from corrections you make in passing.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Skills" icon="graduation-cap" href="/cowork/skills/overview">
    Procedures worth repeating — written by you, or proposed by your coworker and approved by you.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Instructions" icon="pen" href="/cowork/coworkers/instructions">
    The standing brief, which you tighten as you learn what it gets wrong.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>

None of it happens behind your back. Every proposed change waits on the **Improvements** tab for your yes.

<Frame caption="A proposal, with exactly what approving would do spelled out underneath it.">
  <img src="https://mintcdn.com/glorium/D2qvpAHhZ42w5CTR/images/cowork/skills/improving/01-proposal.webp?fit=max&auto=format&n=D2qvpAHhZ42w5CTR&q=85&s=d79c7bbe52c60d3c098b0ccb0485f6d9" alt="An improvement proposal for a new skill, with Dismiss, Tweak and Approve buttons" width="1088" height="336" data-path="images/cowork/skills/improving/01-proposal.webp" />
</Frame>

## Your part in it

The single highest-return habit: **correct it in the chat, in plain words, in the moment.**

> "Too long — half that next time."
>
> "Always check the date on a pricing page before you quote it."
>
> "Don't use that source, it's unreliable."

Each of those is a sentence you'd say to a colleague, and each one lands as something your coworker keeps. This is why it improves — not from watching you, but from you telling it.

<Tip>
  **The third correction is the signal.** Say something once, it's a note. Say it three times and it should be [a skill](/cowork/skills/creating) or a line in the instructions.
</Tip>

## What your coworker does on its own

It notices patterns in its own work and proposes changes: a new skill for a procedure that worked well, a fix to one that didn't, a note worth keeping.

You approve, tweak or dismiss each one. Tweaking is underrated — a proposal is a decent first draft, and five minutes tightening it turns it into something that actually gets used.

There's also an optional periodic tidy-up of the skills it has written for itself, off by default. See [Skills that improve themselves](/cowork/skills/improving).

## What a month looks like

<Steps>
  <Step title="Week one — you correct a lot">
    Format, tone, which sources it trusts, how much detail you want. This feels like work. It is, and it's the whole investment.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Week two — patterns emerge">
    You notice you've said the same thing three times. Write the skill.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Week three — proposals start being good">
    Its suggestions on the Improvements tab start matching what you'd have written.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Week four — you stop thinking about it">
    The output arrives in your format, with your standards applied, and you check rather than fix.
  </Step>
</Steps>

## Good to know

<Note>
  Improvement belongs to one coworker. Three coworkers each learn their own job. Save a well-tuned one as a [template](/cowork/coworkers/templates) to give a new hire the same starting point — skills and instructions carry, memory doesn't.
</Note>

<Warning>
  A coworker that isn't getting better is usually one nobody corrects. If the output is consistently almost-right and nobody says so, nothing changes.
</Warning>

## Common questions

<AccordionGroup>
  <Accordion title="Can it change itself without asking?" icon="lock">
    No. Every change to its skills, memory or instructions waits for your approval on the Improvements tab.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="How often should I check that tab?" icon="calendar">
    Every couple of weeks. Proposals accumulate harmlessly, and reviewing a few at once is easier than one at a time.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Does correcting it slow things down?" icon="gauge-high">
    A sentence in the chat costs nothing and saves the same correction every task afterwards. It's the highest-return thing you can do.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Does the underlying AI get better too?" icon="microchip">
    Models improve, and you can [switch](/cowork/chat/effort-and-model) to a newer one at any time. What's yours — the skills, memory and instructions — carries across.
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="What if it learned something wrong?" icon="eraser">
    Open the [Memory](/cowork/control/memory) tab and delete the note, or edit the skill. Everything it learned is visible and editable.
  </Accordion>
</AccordionGroup>

## Next steps

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Skills that improve themselves" icon="wand-magic-sparkles" href="/cowork/skills/improving">
    Reviewing what it proposes.
  </Card>

  <Card title="What a coworker remembers" icon="brain" href="/cowork/control/memory">
    Reading and fixing its notes.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Creating a skill" icon="pen-to-square" href="/cowork/skills/creating">
    When a correction becomes a procedure.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Autonomy overview" icon="robot" href="/cowork/autonomy/overview">
    Earning unattended work.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>
